forth year: 2001/2002 | series of lectures: lectures / conversations with lecturers / lecturers |
course for curators of contemporary art: course participants / study excursions / program collaborators / exhibition / course participant's texts |
|
Course participants Already during the first phase of planning the concept of the exhibition
the title of the theoretical part of the World of Art program-Strategies
of Presentation presented an important reference, therefore, we focused
on the activism phenomena as a culturally and socio-politically engaged
operation within the art system. Because we were aware of the vastness
of the territory of the chosen theme and the time limits we limited the
focus of our interests to projects which include a tactical(1) use of information and communication technology as well as
electronic (mass) media. The infiltration of new information
and communication technologies into all fields of social life is radically
changing our everyday life. New technologies are not undermining the older
technologic achievements, but are connecting with them; thus they are
expanding and fulfilling the possibilities of using the new technologies
in combination with the old ones. The primacy over the television and
radio frequencies, the Internet, satellite systems and cable networks
is still in the hands of the military, multi-national corporations and
media conglomerates. Their investment into telecommunications gives them
the power, influence and overview of the information transfer within the
signal territory. Amidst artists, activists, hackers, etc., this has (apart
from the price accessibility of the contemporary technologies to the broader
public) encouraged research and development of alternative, creative ways
of using new and old technologies, improving new applications and experimenting.
And this has helped them form a critical view of the political, social,
economic and cultural consequences introduced by the technological changes. As a reply to the established mass communication media in the service of the prevailing ideology, the so-called alternative media have been emerging during the past ten years. These forms of media offer civil initiatives, political activists, cultural commandos, social actors and others the space for expressing and spreading ideas, contents and critics of the current social and political state. Today, direct actions and protest gatherings are joined by new methods of (activist) operation and education of the broader public, and these methods include also new technologies. In the same way that the Tactical Mobile Robot programme, which operates within the frame of DARPA Advanced Technology Office, is developing multifunctional robots for various tasks (for instance checking the terrain and data collection for military purposes, help for police and rescue units, etc.) the Institute for Applied Autonomy has developed a remote controlled robot GraffitiWriter, which can handle five linearly spread cans of colour spray. This mobile platform enables the safely placed operator to spread subversive messages from within an urban environment. This is a social experiment, which tests the capability of robot technology at the creation of a spectacle which would change the public belief. Do-it-yourself is a principle, which dictates a creative approach at the development of alternative possibilities of technology use. Prompts on Stations, a project by the group Pholks & more, is a guide through telecommunications, with the emphasis on the telephone systems and its alternative use. The reader of the manual, dictionary, ethical codex and advice gathered on a diskette and accessible on their homepage(10) is not understood merely as an user of telephone services, but also as a potential active member creating low-budget innovative solutions, which show the possibility to change individual apparatuses and their components. The role of the Internet is
no longer limited merely to the global communication tool, with which
it is possible to search, gather and exchange information, publish publications,
form virtual interest groups, plan and co-ordinate actions, but it is
becoming increasingly used as a tool for direct actions. According to
Dorothy E. Denning(11) such actions include
also attacks which try to disable the normal operation of web sites: virtual
blockades, automatic e-mail bombs, invasions into computer systems, computer
viruses, etc. Denning divided the types of operation into three main activities:
activism, hactivism(12) and cyber-terrorism.
While the first is perceived as a category of non-problematical use of
the Internet, the remaining two categories have become a synonym for computer
crime. In Great Britain the Terrorism Act 2000(13) is in effect as from February this year, and this is an act which offers
a very broad definition of terrorism. According to this act anyone who
'causes serious disturbances in the electronic system' with the intention
to endanger or influence the government or the general public, and performs
this act in order to support 'a political, religious or ideologic principle'
is defined as a terrorist. Apart from enabling the police and security
services to gather and store information on the world wide web the Regulation
of Investigatory Powers Act also gives them the authority to access the
key for coded material without a warrant(14). Paul Mobbs, a member of the British hactivist group electrohippies collective, states the non-understanding of the very basics of the problem as a reason
why the aforementioned acts even reached the parliament(15) This is added also by the slightly crooked understanding of the definition in the media and amidst politicians(16), the mocking definitions which are further evoked by this word and artificial exaggeration of fictive threats, which hactivism as a movement supposedly
represents to the informational and communication technology industries.
Mobbs defines hactivism as 'anything that can be defined through the context'(17). It proclaims itself as the free and open source software movement or as a movement which promotes the idea
of electronic civil disobedience and transforms it into direct actions
against virtual subjects of the corporations or government bodies on the
world wide web, etc. In any event, Mobbs sees it to be of key importance
for the understanding of various groups and their perception of the Internet,
which should represent the first step in the development and influence
upon the public consciousness, which can create a new environment, where
a realisation of social changes will be possible(18)
Notes: (1) www.ljudmila.org/nettime/zkp4/74.htm (2) ibid. (3) Bertold Brech, Theory of the Radio, in Hans Magnus Enzensberger, 'Constituents of a Theory of the Media'. in book Electronic Media and Technoculture, ed. by John Thornton Caldwell, Rutgers, The State University, 2000, p.53 (4) Hans Magnus Enzensberger, 'Constituents of a Theory of the Media', in Electronic Media and Technoculture, ed. by John Thornton Caldwell, Rutgers, The State University, 2000, p.53 (6) ibid. (7) Makrolab is an autonomous, modularly conceived laboratory that, even though it is isolated and placed in extreme natural conditions, can enable long lasting habitation and work to six people with its own energy source and production of food. The operational part of the Makrolab project is represented by scientific and technologic tools, systems and expert knowledge which enables the reflection of three global dynamic systems of the contemporary society: weather and climate, migrations, telecommunications. You can find more on the project at http://makrolab.ljudmila.org (9) Taken from: Brian Springer, 'Satellite feeds' in Ladomir-Faktura: Fourth dimension - The contact dimension!, Materials, Project Atol, Ljubljana, 1st edition, June 1996 (11)
Dorothy E. Denning, Activism, Hacktivism and Cyberterrorism: The
Internet as a Tool for Influencing Foreign Policy, Georgetown University (12) There are numerous definitions which define hactivism, however the most common one is that hactivism is 'merging hacker knowledge with activistic practices' , 'the intertwining of the evolution of the computer activism with the politicisation of hackers' or 'the evolution of activism in a wired global community'. (13)
Abstract, commentary and sources are available at the GreenNet Civil
Society Internet Rights Project homepage. (14)
From: "Ricardo Domiguez" rdom@thing.net (15)
Paola Di Mario, Content-Wire, 19 March 2001 (16) In the media it is quite common to find the wrong use of the word hacker instead of cracker, which was opposed on numerous occasions by the hactivist groups. In the computer vocabulary the word hacker represents an in depth understanding of computer systems and networks and the ability to create, modify and improve such systems, while the word cracker defines taking advantage of expert knowledge on computer systems for illegal purposes. (18) ibid. (19) John Arquila and David Ronfeldt, 'Cyberwar is coming!', www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR880/MR880.ch2.pdf, original published in Comparative Stategy, Volume 12, No. 2. pp. 141 - 165 (20) ibid
|