Razstava Fade In Fade Out
je zasnovana na različnih vidikih, tako umetniškega ustvarjanja
kot kuratorske pozicije. Razstavljena umetniška dela razkrivajo
vzorce delovanja med posameznikom in širšim družbenim kontekstom,
v katerem se nahaja. Umetniki, znani na slovenskem in hrvaškem umetnostnem
prizorišču kot tudi v mednarodnem razstavnem kontekstu, nastopajo
kot glavni akterji prikazanih del. Pri tem ne gre za avtoportrete,
temveč za preizspraševanje umetnikove pozicije. Umetnik sam je protagonist
ali pa pripovedovalec zgodb, ki temeljijo na osebnih izkustvih.
Vadim Fiškin je v projektu
Home TV Installation, izvedenem leta
1996 v Gradcu, nastopal kot televizijski voditelj. Gledalcem je
dajal napotke, kako narediti domačo TV instalacijo, sestavljeno
iz vsakdanjih predmetov. Gledalci so bili pozvani, naj svoje izdelke
fotografirajo in jih pošljejo na naslov razstavišča, kjer je bil
projekt razstavljen. Da bi gledalce vzpodbudil, jim je avtor ponudil
nagradno igro, izžrebani gledalec je prejel nagrado. Home TV Installation
kaže na banalizacijo jezika sodobne umetnosti in na ideološko moč
medijev, v tem primeru televizije. Poleg tega se avtor poigrava
s pomenom umetniškega dela in iskanjem mesta umetnika/subjekta v
širšem, spreminjajočem se simbolnem redu, ki je sestavni del družbe,
pa tudi z nezaupanjem do dominantnih avtoritet.
V videu Alena Floričića,
Brez naslova (2001), se nam v nočnem
prizoru skozi okno odpira pogled v razsvetljeno dnevno sobo. Gre
za pogled navzdol, ki deluje vojeristično, nekako tako, kot da bi
stali pred oknom. V sobi zaznavamo sneženje televizorja in osebo
na kavču. Ta oseba je avtor sam. Deluje kot nekakšen hologram, ki
izginja in se pojavlja, vendar njegovo pojavljanje ni nikoli dokončno.
Floričić v vseh videih uporablja sebe - telo/umetnika/osebo - kot
material, iz katerega so video dela ustvarjena. Kot pravi sam, gre
za edini mogoč material, ki ga lahko uporablja. Značilna je ostrina,
s katero obravnava sebe v vsakdanjih situacijah, ki so prepletene
s satirično-sarkastičnimi elementi. Večina video del prikazujejo
avtorja, ki opravlja različna nesmiselna dejanja. Ta se ponavljajo
v neskončnost in marsikdaj delujejo samodestruktivno. Gre za konfrontacijo
zasebnega in javnega in s tem tudi umetnika in dela ter gledalčeve
recepcije. Prepletata se zgodbi avtorjevega vsakdana in paradoksalnega
stanja, v katerem se je znašel.
Sašo Vrabič je v delu
Vogue (2001) vzel za osnovno formo naslovnico
revije Vogue ali bolje njeno ime. To je vsesplošno prepoznaven trade-
oz. brand mark. Naslovnice se na prvi pogled skorajda ne razlikujejo
od originalov. Ključna razlika je v tem, da se na skoraj vseh pojavlja
avtorjeva podoba. Na spodnjem delu naslovnice je izpisan spremljevalni
tekst. Gre za citate ali zgodbice različnih avtorjev, ki se nanašajo
na različne vidike življenja v današnji kulturi. Delo lahko razumemo
kot primerjavo kustosa in modnega kreatorja. Oba kreirata okus in
estetiko s pozicije moči, vsak s svojega lastnega stališča. Po drugi
strani pa se Vrabič postavi na mesto, rezervirano za lepotne ideale
družbe in na tem mestu deluje kot nekakšen virus. Gledalca vodi
k zavedanju o stereotipu lepotnega ideala, ki nam ga vsiljujejo
mediji. Obenem pa je vseskozi prisotno umetnikovo preizspraševanje
sebe in lastnega ustvarjanja. Mešanje javnega/medijskega in zasebnega/umetnikovega
ter hkrati eskapističnega odnosa posameznika do širšega okolja je
v ospredju našega branja tega dela.
Sodelujoči na tečaju za kustose Sveta
umetosti 2002/03 v organizaciji SCCA,
Zavoda za sodobno umetnost - Ljubljana smo v iskanju koncepta
razstave izhajali iz pogledov, ki so skozi proces dela pripeljali
do zgoraj navedenih umetniških del. Preizspraševanje pozicije umetnika
vidimo skozi preizspraševanje vloge sodobnih kuratorskih praks.
on top
The Fade In Fade Out
exhibition has been conceived on different viewpoints of artistic
making as well as the curatorial position. The exhibited works of
art reveal the patterns which interweave a relationship between
the inner workings of the individual and that of the wider social
context in which it finds itself. The artists, well-known in the
Slovene and Croatian art scene, as well as in the international
exhibiting context, appear in leading roles within the presented
works. This happens not by means of a self-portrait, moreover, through
a re-examination of the artist's own position. The artist is himself
the protagonist, or the storyteller, whose stories are based on
personal experiences.
Vadim Fiškin appeared
as a TV host offering viewers instructions as to how to produce
a home made TV installation from everyday objects in his project
Home TV installation, which was carried
out in Graz in 1996. Viewers were summoned to photograph their products
and send them to the address of the exhibiting venue where the project
was presented. In order to encourage the viewers, the author created
a competition. The winning entrant who was drawn from the lot received
a prize. Home TV installation illustrates the banality of the language
of contemporary art and the ideological strength of the media, in
this case television. Beside that, the author plays with the notion
of the meaning of the work of art and the search for a place for
the artist/subject within a wider, ever changing symbolic order,
which is a consistent part of society, as well as, the distrust
towards dominant authorities.
In Alen Floričić's video
(Untitled, 2001) a night scene of a window
view opens up before us into a lit up living room. This is a view
downwards, which somehow works voyeuristically, seeming as if one
were somehow standing in front of the window. In the room a transmission
of TV snow and a person lying on the settee can be perceived. The
person is the artist himself. It works like some kind of hologram,
appearing and disappearing, never disappearing totally. Floričić
uses himself in all his video works - the body/artist/person - as
the source material from which the videos are made of. What is typical
is the sharpness with which he deals with himself in everyday situations,
which are intertwined with satiric-sarcastic elements. Most video
works present the artist performing different absurd actions. These
repeat into infinity and often function self-destructively. It is
about a confrontation between the public and the private, and with
it also, the artist and the artwork, as well as the perception of
the viewer. Interwoven is the author's everyday life and the paradoxical
condition in which he has found himself.
Sašo Vrabič has taken the famous Vogue
magazine front cover page, or rather its name, for the basic format
for his work Vogue (2001). This is a generally recognisable trade,
or rather, brand mark. The front cover pages, on first appearance,
almost do not differ from their originals. The key difference is
the fact that the artist appears on almost all of them. On the lower
part of each page there is accompanying text. This is in the shape
of quotations or short stories by various authors, referring to
different viewpoints on life within today's culture. The work can
be understood as a comparison between the curator and the fashion
designer. Both create a taste and an aesthetic stemming from the
position of power, each from his own viewpoint. On the other hand,
Vrabič places himself in the position reserved for the beautiful
ideals of society and in this position functions as some kind of
virus. He leads the viewer into the realisation of the stereotypes
regarding the notion of the beautiful ideal, which is being propagated
by the media. At the same time present is the artist's re-examination
of himself and his own artmaking. The mixing of the public/media
and private/artist's, as well as the escapist relationship of the
individual towards his wider environment, is in the forefront in
the viewer's reading of this work.
For those of us, who have participated in the World
of Art 2002/2003 course organised by the SCCA,
Centre for Contemporary Arts - Ljubljana, the search for
the concept of this exhibition has taken us to the viewpoint, which
has, as a point of departure and through the actual processes of
work, brought us to the above mentioned works of art. We see the
re-examination of the artist's position through the re-examination
of the role of contemporary curatorial practices.
on top
|